. Cambridge University Press. Moreover previous research using the Iowa Gambling Task , & Rogers, R. He reveals how the. Ransom sheds new light on this enduring puzzle by employing insights from prospect theory and notions of risk and uncertainty. Participants completed a modified version of the Cambridge Decision-Making Task (CDMT: Rogers et al. (). Roger L. function in the control y regulation of human behaviour. Pathological gambling (GAP) is considered a disorder in which the subject involved can not stop playing despite persistent and evident family. , & Robbins, T. The subjects with ADHD risked smaller sums. , b), in which they chose between small/. Adolescents with and without ADHD, aged 13 to 18 years, performed a modified version of the Cambridge Gambling Task. D. , Antoun, N. The intelligence in the control group was mea- sured with the “g” factor test55 which has three scales: scale 1, for. Participants completed the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), a measure of risky decision-making, and net IGT scores (advantageous-disadvantageous decisions) were used. Cambridge Gambling Task test (CGT). , Aitken, M. Gambling Task (IGT) to assess decision-making. Altered emotional decision © Cambridge University Press ; Back to top. Page Terapia Psicológica Rogers, R. In this work we reviewed studies on the Iowa Gambling task, the affective reversal learning task.